quickcheck and ghci
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
marcot at debian.org
Tue Apr 26 22:32:19 BST 2011
Excerpts from Nick Smallbone's message of Ter Abr 26 16:01:35 -0300 2011:
> > A second approach is to split this module in another package, for example,
> > quickcheck-th. The advantage is that, with the first approach, we either
> > remove this module from Debian or keep the undesired dependency in TH. With
> > the second approach, the module can be kept in Debian without requiring the
> > dependency in TH for the quickcheck package.
> With this new flag, won't QC depend on TH only on architectures where
> TH is available? Setup.lhs will set the templateHaskell flag if the
> template-haskell package exists and clear the flag otherwise, and it
> only issues a Build-depends: template-haskell if the flag is true, so
> it'll all work out automatically, won't it?
Yes, you're right, there's no need of splitting the package.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the QuickCheck