ANNOUNCE: brillig 0.3 - not quite the Brill tagger
eric.kow at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 12:52:09 BST 2011
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 13:32:17 +0200, Grzegorz Chrupała wrote:
> I think I don't get it. How would you use a discriminatively trained
> tagger like sequor in combination with the Brill tagger?
So, at the moment, I don't know what a "discriminatively trained" tagger
is and wouldn't know how to start trying to answer such a question...
But hopefully I won't have to, because I was actually just saying
something incredibly simple and non-technical, that the brillig
executable could just provide a thin wrapper around different kinds of
taggers (as alternatives to each other, completely disjoint).
You know, files go in, tags come out... but this was before I looked
at the training file format and understood that this is what sequor
provides. Oh well, this probably makes brillig just a bit redundant in
infrastructure terms. :-)
> For what it's worth, I just trained Sequor (using several spelling
> features as encoded in the data/mlcomp2.features template) on the
> initial 90% of the Brown corpus, and tested on the final 10%, and got
> an accuracy of 96.2%. Training takes several hours, but tagging runs
> at more than 3000 words/second.
PS. can we have a small release with '-rtsopts'?
Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NLP