Contribution vs quality, and a few notes on the Platform process
dons at galois.com
Thu Nov 11 11:35:29 EST 2010
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:18:37AM +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > This is moving in the opposite direction from what Ross suggests above -
> > making the platform less of an aggregation mechanism and more of a
> > single community project. Could it work? I'm not sure. Clearly Ross's
> > model would "work", but it would produce something that's less like a
> > platform.
> Steering committee, I think we need to resolve this question before we
> can make progress. How should we proceed?
> Also, is there a better list than haskell-platform at projects for
> communicating with the steering committee? I don't see any addresses on
> the committee list page:
What is the question? I don't think libraries@ has a mandate to change
the current HP goals or process, for example, so I'm unclear what
exactly is being proposed.
More information about the Haskell-platform