The synopsis drawer
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Tue Aug 3 19:41:03 EDT 2010
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Lentczner <markl at glyphic.com> wrote:
> So, it seems that we don't have a clear idea of what to do about the
> synopsis drawer. Our options are:
> 1) Nuke it
> 2) Keep it as it is now
> 3) Keep it, but graphically de-emphasise the tab (but not to the previous
> "subtle" yellow strip)
> 4) Drop the drawer and go back to the classic style (actually, none of us
> like this one, I think)
> Further, if we're keeping it, then what style?
> 1) type signatures or just names or some shortened type signature
> 2) include contents headings or no
> 3) document order or alphabetize (!?)
> I'm kind of in favor of keeping it, and with the current type-signature
> form. I don't particularly like the way all that text looks - but I admit
> that I use the synopsis in the current Haddock all the time.
> That said, perhaps we should ask our constituents. I could put together a
> few examples and a survey and put it out to haskell-cafe. Are we willing to
> live by the wisdom of the commons? If so, I can put that together in a day
> or so. Or should we just decide.
I think that would be a good idea. Perhaps someone has some additional
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haddock